Celebrating
its 40th anniversary today is the eleventh studio album from Queen, The
Works, which was released on February 27th, 1984. After the mixed
reaction to what many considered the band's most disappointing LP, Hot
Space, The Works made a concerted effort to redress some of the concerns
expressed by fans and critics, while continuing to retain some of the
new creative ground that had been cultivated on what was, frankly, a
misjudged and under appreciated prior album.
1982's Hot Space had
taken Queen into a new, synth-heavy soundscape that many fans felt was a
betrayal for a band who spent the previous decade proudly proclaiming
"NO SYNTHS" on all their albums. The focus on dance oriented soul and
R&B funkiness also seemed out of character and the band's tour
across the US included incidents where Mercury flatly scolded audiences
for their impatience with the band's new material. To add insult to
injury, US broadcasters reacted harshly against the cheeky drag imagery
of the video for I Want To Break Free, all of which contributed to the
band's decision to cease touring the US for the remainder of their
career while Mercury was still fronting the band. It's a decision that
would cost them some sales in America during the decade, though the
band's status elsewhere skyrocketed after the release of The Works.
After
the end of the Hot Space tour, the band felt a need to take a break, a
situation that was erroneously portrayed in the Bohemian Rhapsody movie
from 2018 as a "break up". There was never any intention to pack it in
as a band, though most of the group were looking forward to doing some
solo work, or collaborations with other people. Brian worked with Eddie
Van Halen on a project, while Roger and Freddie each got stuck in on
solo albums. There was some talk about returning to South America to
tour after the spectacular success of their last stop there, but those
plans fell through. By August of 1983, they were all ready to
reassemble and start putting together a new album, which would be
released through a new label after their deal with Elektra in the US,
Canada, Australian and Japan was nullified. The new album would be
their first to be released on EMI and its US affiliate, Capital Records.
The
bulk of the recording sessions would take place at LA's Record Plant,
which would be the only time the group ever recorded in the US. The
final mixing and overdubbing would occur in January of 1984 at Musicland
studios in Munich, Germany. While Queen had been quite self sufficient
on their albums throughout the 1970s, by the time they were recording
The Works, they were also relying a lot on live session keyboardist,
Fred Mandel, who contributed synth and other keyboard parts to several
tracks on the album. Also, regular engineer, Reinhold Mack, was helping
out with sampling on the then unfamiliar Fairlight CMI.
The
title for the album came about because of an off-the-cuff comment by
Roger that was a response to the backlash against the previous album.
He suggested the group "give 'em the works" for the next album, meaning
that they should give fans a bit of everything the band were able to
muster. And that's pretty much exactly what they did. While they'd
return to some of the hard rock sounds of their earlier career, they
didn't give up on the electronics heavy music they'd explored on the
controversial Hot Space album, and ended up creating one of their most
iconic songs in the process.
Radio Ga Ga had been inspired by a
bit of toddler prattle from Roger's son, which inspired Taylor to write
the song, ironically utilizing keyboards and drum machines. Roger had
initially been against such devices, but was now embracing them. John
Deacon helped out with a bass line, while Freddie came in and radically
reassembled it with his own take on the arrangements. The result was a
song that not only provided a hit single & video, but one of the
band's most engaging moments when played live. The distinctive "clap
clap" chorus, with hands held straight in the air, became a unifying
moment of audience participation, even rivalling the "stomp-stomp-clap"
of We Will Rock You. The sight of throngs of fans all performing the
motion in unison became one of the most breathtaking moments of their
massive stadium live shows during the 1980s, at least while the band
were still able to tour with Freddie.
The other song on the
album that created quite a stir was I Want To Break Free, another ear
catching classic written by John Deacon. The ruckus over this all came
down to the video and the US market's aversion to anything that smacked
of "gender-bending". The fuss was ridiculous, however, because the
"drag" that was incorporated was so utterly ludicrous. The concept was
another flash of inspiration from Roger, who suggested the group do
something of a parody of the UK soap, Coronation Street. The concept
went down a treat for fans who were familiar with the series, but the US
market were clueless and simply didn't get the joke or the reference.
For those that did, seeing them in such outrageous attire was a
laugh-riot, with Brian and John looking dowdy and stern, while Taylor
chewed bubblegum as a saucy teen temptress and Mercury tough-dragged out
with moustache firmly in place while he vacuumed in his red leather
miniskirt. It remains one of the band's most memorable videos, next to
Bohemian Rhapsody.
Upon its release, it took off on the charts,
though its success was muted in the US by the band's refusal to tour
there. Though it just missed the number 1 slot in the UK, it set the
record for any Queen studio album by lingering in the charts for an
astonishing 94 weeks! My relationship with the album is somewhat
distant, however, as it came out at a time when Queen were simply off my
radar, so while I appreciated the humour of something like I Want To
Break Free, the music on the album has not quite developed much of a
relationship with me, beyond a few tracks. Maybe one day I'll be able
to embrace it more, but I do appreciate that it became a key piece of
the band's history, critical in establishing their legacy, which
continues to sustain fan interest over three decades after Freddie
Mercury left this world.
2024-02-27
QUEEN - THE WORKS @40
DEAD CAN DANCE @ 40
Released
on February 27th, 1984, the debut eponymous LP from Dead Can Dance is
turning 40 years old today. Though its style is less representative of
the direction their music would take on subsequent releases, the essence
of their style was coming into bloom.
The group began life in
Melbourne, Australia in 1981, initially taking shape as a fairly
conventional four piece band, complete with bass, drums and guitars.
The group migrated to the UK in May of 1982 and, once settled, managed
to secure a contract with 4AD Records, who were just beginning to
establish themselves with Gothic "dream pop" bands like Cocteau Twins, a
sound that was very much in line with Dead Can Dance's initial
manifestation.
The musicians who performed on the album were
Brendan Perry (vocals & guitar), Lisa Gerrard (vocals &
percussion), Paul Erikson (bass), Peter Ulrich (drums & percussion),
James Pinker and Scott Roger. The most exotic instrument used was
Lisa's yangqin, which is a Chinese stringed instrument similar to a
hammer dulcimer. Though the group were labelled "Goth" by the press
based on the perception that they were preoccupied with macabre themes,
the label was denied by the band, who had conceived of their name as a
far more positive symbol of bringing life to the inanimate, infusing
their work with an energy of renewal. This, however, didn't stop
critics from labelling their debut "as goth as it gets."
After
their debut, the group would pair down to the core duo of Perry &
Gerrard, with any additional instrumental duties the duo weren't able to
perform themselves being provided by session players and guests. Their
sound would also move away from any vestigial connections to "rock"
music, incorporating elements of classical, folk and a variety of world
music influences to create their distinctive, evocative sounds.
2024-02-26
SEX PISTOLS - THE GREAT ROCK 'N' ROLL SWINDLE @ 45
Released
on February 26th, 1979, the soundtrack to the Sex Pistols movie, The
Great Rock 'n' Roll Swindle, turns 45 years old today. While it's hard
to call this a proper album by the group, among the clutter and
confusion, there are some genuinely amusing punk gags and a few nasty
bits of ephemera worth the price of admission.
Before the group
imploded at the end of their chaotic 1978 US mini-tour, Malcolm McLaren
had been working on the idea of a feature film for the band, initially
titled, "Who Killed Bambi?". With Johnny Rotten unceremoniously dumped
after their San Francisco gig in January of 1978, the prospect of
putting together a feature film, let along the film's soundtrack, seemed
rather slim. Yet McLaren was determined to push this project past the
finish line, even if he had to run it on fumes, including resorting to
hiding cameras in bushes to try to film Lydon while on vacation in
Jamaica & scouting reggae bands for Richard Branson. It was
fortunate then that Malcolm managed to come across a forgotten 1976 tape
of the band rehearsing.
The demo contained recordings of the
band performing a number of cover songs, many of which were part of
their live set at the time. These included The Monkees' Stepping Stone,
The Modern Lovers' Roadrunner, Chuck Berry's Johnny B Goode and The
Who's Substitute. An early demo version of Anarchy in the UK was also
uncovered. None of these recordings had ever been released before, so
Malcolm came up with the idea of doing a bit of recycling in order to
have a few building blocks upon which to structure some sort of
soundtrack. Unfortunately, the demos were not of the best recording
quality, being only 4 track roughs, but the vocal and bass parts were
salvageable, or rather had to be as both Johnny and Glen were no longer
in the band. At minimum, he could re-record Steve's guitar and Paul's
drum parts again, to help freshen up the sound and allow him to claim
the album contained actual Sex Pistols songs that were not previously
released.
To fill out the rest of the double LP capacity,
McLaren assembled a pastiche of odds and ends, firstly by having the
remaining band members record some new material with lead vocals either
being provided by them or by guest vocalists. Sid recorded cover
versions of My Way, Something Else and C'mon Everybody, artifacts that
would become his only proper studio appearances before his tragic death.
Paul & Steve each provided lead vocals on a couple of tracks which
were essentially prototypes for their post-Pistols project, The
Professionals. Edward Tudor-Pole provided vocals for several tracks as
well, but the most controversial guest was exiled "Great Train Robber",
Ronnie Biggs, who provided vocals for Belsen Was a Gas and No One Is
Innocent. That inclusion drew a lot of criticism because of Biggs'
violent history and the impression that the appearance celebrated those
heinous crimes.
The rest of the album is patched together with a
handful of novelty songs, such as the disco medley by a fake studio
band, The Black Arabs, and some French street performers were used on a
parody of Anarchy in the UK. Malcolm took the task of crooning the
saccharine, sentimental, You Need Hands. Other than the salvaged demos
from 1976, Johnny Rotten had nothing whatsoever to do with the
production of the album, completely disavowing it and the film upon
their release and asserting they were NOT legitimate Sex Pistols
products, but merely another of Malcolm's cons.
Taken as a
whole, the album is a hodgepodge of occasionally amusing relics and
random moments of ecstatic excess. Sid's rendition of My Way, for
example, has gone on to become his signature statement of nihilistic
self-destruction. The Pistols demos capture the band in a state of raw
good humour, having a laugh before it all became too fucking crazy.
Even the disco song is an amusing poke in the eye to the punks who clung
to pretensions about what the movement was. In the end, the record
does what it says on the tin. It's a total "swindle", but fun enough if
you're in on the joke.
2024-02-23
QUEEN - SEVEN SEAS OF RHYE @ 50
The song was originally used to close off the group's debut album, albeit in a simplified instrumental form. The original intent was for their follow up album to feature the full version as the opening track, but that plan was changed after the "black vs white" concept came into place for Queen II, where it was ultimately used to close the second album, morphing into a sea shanty at the end of the song. It was a theme that was picked up on the beginning of the third album, Sheer Heart Attack, which opens with a similar refrain before breaking into Brighton Rock.
The song was written by Freddie Mercury, beginning life as far back as 1969, though Brian May contributed some elements in its final form, but was not given writing credit at the time it was published. At that time, Queen were of the habit that the principal songwriter was always given full credit for their song, an arrangement that wouldn't change until much later in their career, when they began to share writing credit among the band members more equally.
The theme of the song was based on an imaginary kingdom Freddie and his sister had dreamed up as children, the land of Rhye. This fairytale kingdom would also be referenced on the band's next album, in the song, Lily of the Valley, and would ultimately become an integral part of the Queen jukebox musical, We Will Rock You (2002), as a place where the Bohemians are taken after they are brain-drained by Khashoggi.
The song is exemplary of Queen in all their grandeur, highlighting their fiery guitar histrionics and vocal harmonies, and driven by a rapid-fire piano arpeggio by Mercury. It's the kind of pomp and pretense that only Queen could pull off with credibility. When Mercury commands, "Bring before me what is mine!", you don't question it, you get the man whatever the fuck he wants.
The B-Side of the single was a rare non-LP track, See What A Fool I've Been. The single release predated the release of their 2nd album by a few weeks as delays held up the LPs production.
2024-02-20
TANGERINE DREAM - PHAEDRA @ 50
On
this day, half a century ago on February 20th, 1974, the future of
electronic music would receive one of its most important foundation
stones, as Tangerine Dream released their fifth studio album, Phaedra.
It was an album that would introduce one of the most crucial components
to the production of synthesizer based music, with the step sequencer
taking centre stage on this most influential album.
As well as
introducing music fans to the mechanical, hypnotic bass pulse of the
step sequenced modular synthesizer, this was the first album by the
group to be released on Richard Branson's burgeoning Virgin Records.
Branson had heard a set of recordings Edgar Froese and Christopher
Franke had made earlier in 1973 at Skyline Studios in Berlin, and was
impressed enough to sign the group to his label and invite them to come
to the UK to record. They set up camp at The Manor in
Shipton-on-Cherwell during November of 1973 and spent just under six
weeks to complete the album.
Initial production did not go
smoothly, however, as the group and studio engineers wrestled with a
seemingly endless string of technical issues. Things began to change
with a breakthrough recording by Edgar Froese, assisted by his wife,
Monique. Froese recalled the session.
"Phaedra was the first
album in which many things had to be structured. The reason was that we
were using the Moog sequencer (all driving bass notes) for the first
time. Just tuning the instrument took several hours each day, because at
the time there were no presets or memory banks. We worked each day from
11 o'clock in the morning to 2 o'clock at night. By the 11th day we
barely had 6 minutes of music on tape. Technically everything that could
go wrong did go wrong. The tape machine broke down, there were repeated
mixing console failures and the speakers were damaged because of the
unusually low frequencies of the bass notes. After 12 days of this we
were completely knackered. Fortunately, after a two-day break in the
countryside a new start brought a breakthrough. 'Mysterious Semblance'
was recorded on Dec 4th. Pete (Baumann) and Chris (Franke) were asleep
after a long day's recording session so I invited my wife, Monique, into
the studio. I called in the studio engineer and recorded it in one take
on a double-keyboarded Mellotron while Monique turned the knobs on a
phasing device. This piece is on the record exactly as it was recorded
that day. And this practice was to continue for the rest of the
session."
The title track was originally based on an
improvisation recorded in the studio, and unintentionally exhibits one
of the limitations of the analog equipment used at the time. As the
equipment warmed up, some of the oscillators began to detune (they were
highly temperature-sensitive), which was responsible for some of the
changes in the music towards the end of the piece. Both the title track
and "Movements of a Visionary" rely on Franke's use of the Moog analog
sequencer as a substitute for bass guitar.
With the release of
the album, Tangerine Dream were suddenly thrust onto the world stage as
the premier ambassadors of the new German "Krautrock" scene, even
though, ironically, Phaedra did rather poorly in Germany, selling a mere
6,000 units. But the story was very different on the international
markets, as it reached gold record status in no less than seven
countries. This was all with virtually no airplay and sales only being
pushed by word of mouth by fans. In the UK, the album peaked at #15 on
the LP charts!
Its effect on the trajectory of electronic music
was incalculable. The sound of precision, pulsing step-sequencer
synth-bass became ubiquitous within techno pop music as the decade
progressed, becoming foundational to iconic, groundbreaking works by the
likes of Kraftwerk and Giorgio Moroder. Phaedra has since gone on to
be acknowledged as one of Tangerine Dream's most essential and respected
albums, defining the group's career from that point forward.
STEELY DAN - PRETZEL LOGIC @ 50
Celebrating
its 50th anniversary today is the third studio album from Steely Dan,
Pretzel Logic, which was released on February 20th, 1974. Featuring the
hit single, Rikki Don't Loose That Number, the album and single would
re-establish the band as sophisticated hit makers after the
disappointing performance of the previous album and singles.
By
the time of their third LP, Steely Dan were evolving beyond the five
piece touring band that had started out a few years earlier. Walter
Becker & Donald Fagen were less interested in touring and the other
regular members of the band were finding themselves marginalized as LA
studio musicians were being brought in to help render the group's
increasingly complex song arrangements. Indeed, the album would mark
the end of Steely Dan as a functional touring band and put Becker and
Fagen in place at its only consistent members going forward.
Musically,
the duo were determined to reign in their excesses by cutting back on
song lengths and soloing excursions. They were aiming to keep their
forays into the more highbrow jazz influences constrained by the three
minute pop format. The move managed to make the album more accessible,
while still retaining their penchant for sophisticated, layered musical
arrangements. The result was a concise, meticulously crafted example of
mainstream friendly pop music that still contained the sophistication
of its higher aspirations. Lyrically, Fagen was looking for a kind of
suggestive vagueness that avoided explicit implications while still
evoking an emotional resonance. Some people may have found that
creative choice confusing, preferring to have their content laid out,
plain and simple, but more adventurous listeners could appreciate the
room for interpretation that was being created between the words.
As
well as being a commercial success, the album was near universally
praised by critics, topping numerous "best of" year end polls. Its
legacy has secured it as essential listening for anyone seeking to
explore the band's music. It is also a reminder that popularity need
not come at the cost of intelligence and creative ambitions. That the
band were able to top charts while building on complex, mature musical
structures stands sharply in contrast to the computer generated
disposable pop of the modern age.
2024-02-19
COIL - HOW TO DESTROY ANGELS @ 40
Recorded
on February 19th, 1984, Coil's debut EP, How To Destroy Angels, turns
40 years old today. As an example of functional music intended for
practical application, it set the standard for the band's uncompromising
approach to sound and structure.
At the time of its recording,
Jhon Balance and Peter Christopherson were still part of Psychic TV
(PTV) and the Temple of Psychick Youth (TOPY), and this project was seen
as furthering the exploration of sound as a functional tool, rather
than a mere source of entertainment and distraction. Many of the ideas
present here were also used when recording the Psychic TV, Themes, bonus
LP, which was included with the first pressings of PTV's debut, Force
The Hand of Chance. These were sound works that had no concern with
standard song structures, an approach that could be rather confusing to
listeners who were expecting them to adhere to recognizable conventions
of rhythm, melody and verse-chorus-bridge, song structures. None of
that was relevant here, which often had these recordings sounding like
random noises, devoid of meaning or purpose. The reality was quite the
opposite.
For this particular project, the fact that Balance and
Christopherson were gay and involved in a relationship with each other
became essential elements in the thematic essence of the recording. The
intent of its creators was to incite and harness specifically male
sexual energy. No offence nor disparagement to females was intended,
but this work was simply NOT designed for feminine energy. This
requirement during production was even taken to the strictest
conditional extremes, where any women at the studio were kindly
requested to vacate the building during recording. For this, manly Mars
was the focus for the session and it was crucial that nothing diffuse
or dissipate that energy. Venus wasn't invited.
For
instrumentation, a selection of gongs, cymbals and bells were employed,
along with a large corrugated whirling tube, known as a lasso d'amore,
corrugaphone, or Bloogle Resonator. The resultant recording was 17
minutes of ritualistic ambience, suitable for personal or group
ceremonial use. The original plan was to release it along with another
PTV recording, Silence and Secrecy, but Balance & Christopherson had
a falling out with TOPY and Genesis P-Orridge over his "cult of
personality" and the direction TOPY was going, so any PTV works or
resources were now unavailable, including the label imprint, Temple
Records. The EP was instead released by L.A.Y.L.A.H. Anti-Records as a
standalone, with the B-side initially occupied by an unplayable "noise"
side called Absolute Elsewhere. On subsequent repressing, the B-side
was repeatedly changed, first to offer a selection of closed loop tones
and then a totally blank side.
Although How To Destroy Angels
is not typical of Coil's subsequent output, it remains as one of their
most enigmatic and effective creations. It's certainly one of my
personal favourites when it comes to music with the power to summon
distinct and powerful energies. To put it plainly, it's a great record
to fuck to, especially if you're gay.
2024-02-18
KISS @ 50
Released
50 years ago today, on February 18, 1974, the eponymous debut LP from
KISS is celebrating its golden jubilee. While the album didn't break
the band into the heights that would come with the release of their 1975
"Alive!" set, it gave them the rock solid foundations that would
provide the songs needed to make that later LP a classic. So many of
the bands most established concert favourites are found on this album,
it's impossible not to retroactively consider this as perhaps their most
important release.
KISS formally began the year before, after
Paul Stanley and Gene Simmons pulled the plug on their Wicked Lester
band, when that project failed to come together into the vision they'd
been brewing up between them. Originating in 1970 as Rainbow, Wicked
Lester was an entity that had evolved a kind of accessible, vaguely
psychedelic 1960s pop-rock aesthetic, while Paul & Gene were sensing
something heavier, darker and vastly more theatrical bubbling up from
their creative juices. That all came clearly into focus when they
re-branded themselves as KISS. The founders also changed their names
from Gene Klein (who'd already renamed himself from the Hebrew name,
"Chaim Witz") & Stanley Eisen to Gene Simmons & Paul Stanley,
respectively. They then ditched the dead weight musicians from Wicked
Lester, and hired Ace Frehley and Peter Criss to complete their new
quartet. The name changes for Gene & Paul were driven by a
self-consciousness about being Jewish, and concern over being rejected
by mainstream rock audiences because of it. It's a situation that
raises a lot of concerns, but the presence of antisemitism in popular
culture is unavoidable, and they were certainly not the only
entertainers to take such precautions with their personal branding in
order to avoid sounding too "ethnic" to "white bread" Anglo-Saxon US
audiences.
Bringing a stash of songs forward from the Wicked
Lester set, the band had a leg up when it came to getting an album
together, though the new arrangements were vastly different from the
older demos. You can readily find Wicked Lester versions of KISS songs
around, and it's rather striking to hear how dissimilar they sound,
pointing to a very conscious contrivance to move away from the
airy-fairy sounds of the past, and into decidedly more "metal" territory
with the new band. Needless to say, you weren't gonna hear any flutes
on a KISS record!
When it came time to record their debut at
NYC's Bell Sound Studios, production came together quickly, and the
album was essentially completed, start to finish, in just 13 days.
The studio was owned by the same company that owned Buddha Records,
which was where Neil Bogart was an executive before starting Casablanca
Records. This put Neil in the right place to hear the band and sign
them to kick off his brand new label. Neil had negotiated a
distribution deal with Warner Bros, specifically because they owned the
rights to the movie, Casablanca. This association enabled Bogart to
appropriate the name, imagery and graphic styling from the movie without
having to worry about any copyright or trademark infringement actions
from WB. However, when Bogart held an elaborate release party in LA for
the KISS album, WB execs were incensed by KISS' outrageous stage antics
and appearance. Afterwards WB demanded KISS stop wearing their
trademark makeup, but manager Bill Aucoin backed the band and refused to
concede to the demands. The result was that WB released Bogart from
any further obligation to the company, which on one hand, gave him
complete autonomy, but on the other, pulled the funding rug out from
under Casablanca's budgets.
With KISS' debut album floundering
in sales, Bogart became desperate to generate revenue, so he insisted
that KISS needed a hit single, pushing them to record the cover song,
Kissing Time, which had been a Top 20 hit for Bobby Rydell in 1959. It
was recorded two months after the album was released, but was
subsequently added to all future represses and re-releases. Though the
single wasn't a hit on its own, it did boost LP sales noticeably after
it was added. Sales were also helped as the band made some key TV
appearances, the most notorious of which was on the Mike Douglas daytime
talk show, aired March 29, 1974. During the interview portion of the
show, Gene Simmons awkwardly declared himself to be "evil incarnate",
eliciting nervous, confused reactions from the studio audience, to which
comedian Totie Fields humorously commented, "Wouldn't it be funny if
he's just a nice Jewish boy underneath the makeup?" Although neither
confirming nor denying his Jewish heritage, Simmons replied, "You should
only know", to which, Fields countered, "I do. You can't hide the
hook", referring to Simmons' nose.
The album's cover photo evokes
a similar look to that seen on With The Beatles from a decade earlier,
with the band members' faces highlighted against a black background.
Gene, Paul and Ace all executed their own makeup, but professional
makeup artists were used on Peter, though they somewhat missed the mark
in terms of recreating his established look. The results were decidedly
more "tribal" than "cat-like", and Criss immediately reverted to his
usual look after the shoot. Paul had only recently modified his look to
the "Star Man" after initially adopting a "bandit" mask. Ace augmented
his appearance with some silver, water soluble spray paint in his hair.
The bulk of the songs on the album would end up forming the
backbone of KISS' live show for the remainder of the decade and beyond.
Strutter, Nothin' To Lose, Firehouse, Cold Gin, Deuce and Black Diamond
all became staples, if not linchpin moments for their live theatrics of
breathing fire, spitting blood and soloing. I don't think any
subsequent album from the group could lay claim to supplying so many
critical components for their live performances. Aside from the more
recognizable songs, there is also one of my favourite "deep cuts" from
the band in the form of the rare instrumental, Love Theme From KISS,
which started out as a live club set piece called "Acrobat". It's an
excellent little example of New York funk-rock that simply grooves
without having to make a spectacle of itself.
While the album's
initial sales were disappointing, once the group got some traction with
Alive!, fans soon back-tracked to pick up the three studio albums which
had come before it, all of which helped their debut be certified gold
by June 8th of 1977. For old time KISS fans, their debut album remains a
touchstone to the band that many first fell for when they were
adolescents and looking for something to alienate their parents. Those
first few years were a time when the band had an air of danger and
controversy, before they became a "kids" band, pushing comic books and
bad superhero movies. KISS were the first band I ever collected, buying
all their albums up until Double Platinum and Gene Simmons' solo KISS
album in 1978 (I never bought the rest of the solo albums). By that
time, it was "punk" and "new wave" that were demanding my allowance
money, but I've always had a soft spot for KISS's early years and the
memories those records bring back of my junior high teen years in the
mid '70s. I even wore platform shoes for a couple of years, and fell
off them regularly, like all the other kids my age.
2024-02-15
THE MONKEES - INSTANT REPLAY @ 55
Marking
its 55th anniversary today is the seventh studio LP from The Monkees,
Instant Replay, which was released on February 15th, 1969. With the
crescendo of Monkeemania rapidly diminishing in the band's rear view
mirror, it's an album that saw the group grasping at the past in order
to try to give themselves a future.
By the time Instant Replay
hit the record shops, it had been 11 months since the group's fame
making TV series had been cancelled, and the group were also in the wake
of a feature film that had died a pitiless death at the box-office,
followed by a similarly disastrous TV special, both of which had only
befuddled and alienated remaining and dwindling fans of the band.
Ravenous critics were also salivating at the chance to trash the band
some more. Their previous album, The Birds the Bees and the Monkees
(1968), had managed to do well despite just missing the #1 US LP spot
after their first four LPs had all smashed to the top, and Daydream
Believer had been a #1 hit in December of 1967. But the band were
running on fumes in terms of popularity, and Peter Tork had bailed
shortly after the thud of the TV special hit the airwaves.
Trying
to help regroup and reignite their popularity, Brendan Cahill, the
band's former road manager and new music coordinator, encouraged the
remaining members to pilfer some of the unreleased recordings that were
created prior to their infamous "palace revolt", which saw original
music director, Don Kirshner, ousted in order to give the band full
creative control of their music. There were still unreleased tracks
from their initial 1966/67 sessions that were felt might be enough to
spur some chart action, so along with a plethora of newer tracks
recorded since The Birds, The Bees and the Monkees, the trio began to
assemble a pastiche of an album, mixing older songs along with the newer
recordings that were waiting in the wings. It's because of this
approach that Peter York still managed to make a guest appearance, by
virtue of having worked on one of the older recordings. Of the older
tracks, Tear Drop City, a Boyce & Hart song, was selected as the
first single, but it failed to chart above #56 in the US. In the UK,
the band's fortunes were even more in decline. The album itself managed
to still crack the top 40 in the US, peaking at #32, but the writing
was surely on the wall.
Though they no longer had a weekly TV
series, Mike, Micky & Davy continued to attempt to keep themselves
in the public eye by making guest appearances on various TV shows,
including sharing a square on Hollywood Squares, and performances on the
Johnny Cash & Glen Campbell variety shows, respectively. It still
wasn't enough to prevent the inevitable deflation of their career by the
end of the decade, and only two more albums would follow, with Mike
leaving after the next, before their complete dissolution in 1970.
But
like all things connected with the band, a renaissance was in the
future, a process that would repeat itself virtually every decade since
their initial rise to mega-stardom. In 2011, Rhino Handmade issued a
super-deluxe expanded edition of Instant Replay, just as they'd done
with many of their other records, packing it with unreleased extras,
alternate takes, unfinished demos and other ephemera of the era. While
it may not represent the group at their peak, there are still plenty of
deep cuts lurking on this album to reward stalwart fans who may be
looking for neglected gems.
2024-02-08
BRIAN ENO - HERE COME THE WARM JETS @ 50
Eno began working on the album shortly after his departure from Roxy Music, and he would utilized a number of former band-mates to contribute to the record, in a addition to a long list of other extremely varied collaborators. His explicit intent with his selection of guests was to counterpoint them against each other in an attempt to contrast seemingly incompatible styles and personal approaches. He specifically wanted to encourage them to break from their own conventions by being forced to interact with others who worked in entirely different ways. In terms of directing their performances, Eno often resorted to non-verbal instruction, using body language and interpretive dance moves as a means of expressing his intent. Once he'd captured performances from his musicians, he'd then take that raw material and process it in the studio until he attained often unrecognizable end results. Stylistically, he pulled together a pastiche of influences, both contemporary and vintage, incorporating elements of 1950s pop and rock & roll with elements of modern art-rock.
Though Eno didn't consider himself much of a singer, and indeed would mostly abandon that aspect of his creative arsenal in his later works, for his initial "pop" centred albums, he developed an approach to lyrics that involved first making nonsense vocalizations along with the music in order to identify phonetic qualities that best suited the piece. From this point, he'd gradually build in actual words and phrasing that ingrained those qualities, with the meaning of the lyrics being rather secondary to the process. This technique tended to deliver results that were cryptic and free-associative. As a result, Eno discouraged listeners from imposing too much emphasis on the meaning in the words. It's an approach that he'd pass on to people like David Bowie, who'd incorporate the methodology into the albums Eno produced with him during their Berlin era collaborations.
Critical response to the album was near universally positive, with only a few contrarian opinions on the album's merits. Critic Lester Bangs of CREEM declared it "incredible," and noted that "the predominant feel is a strange mating of edgy dread with wild first-time-out exuberance." Robert Christgau of The Village Voice gave it an "A" rating, stating that "The idea of this record, 'Top of the Pops' from 'quasi-dadaist British synth wizard', may put you off, but the actuality is quite engaging in a vaguely Velvet Underground kind of way." With Eno coming off of his association with Roxy Music, he had enough career momentum to make the record a top 40 hit in the UK, making it one of his best selling solo releases, though it barely broke the top 200 in the US. Nevertheless, its legacy has assured it a place as essential listening when it comes to important releases from that era and in terms of appreciating Eno's catalogue in all its diversity.
2024-02-07
BLAZING SADDLES @ 50
Celebrating
its golden anniversary today is Mel Brooks' outrageous western farce,
Blazing Saddles, which was first screened on February 7th, 1974. While
lampooning the absurdities of racism, it managed to bring the laughs to
audiences in enough droves to make it Warner Bros highest grossing
comedy of the year.
The idea for the film began with
writer/director Andrew Bergman, who'd started off the project with the
name "Tex X" as a play on Malcolm X's name. His intent was to write and
produce the film himself, hiring Alan Arkin to direct, with James Earl
Jones slotted to play the lead of Sheriff Bart. Bergman couldn't get
the project off the ground on his own, however, but he'd shown it to Mel
Brooks, who took an immediate shine to the concept, so he came to the
rescue, buying the rights to the treatment Bergman had put together.
The title of "Tex X" was then rejected by Brooks, who felt people would
think it was an X-rated adult movie. The title "Black Bart" was kicked
around for a bit, but the name was already associated with a white
heavyweight boxer from the 19th century. Brooks ultimately came up with
"Blazing Saddles" in a flash of inspiration while in the shower one
morning.
For script development, Brooks kept Bergman onboard to
co-write, and also brought in Richard Pryor, Norman Steinberg and Alan
Uger. He had not worked with a writing team since Your Show of Shows,
and posted a large sign in the writing room that encouraged: "Please do
not write a polite script." Brooks described the writing process as
chaotic:
"Blazing Saddles was more or less written in the middle
of a drunken fistfight. There were five of us all yelling loudly for our
ideas to be put into the movie. Not only was I the loudest, but luckily
I also had the right as director to decide what was in or out."
Bergman remembers the room being just as chaotic, telling Creative Screenwriting,
"In
the beginning, we had five people. One guy left after a couple of
weeks. Then, it was basically me, Mel, Richie Pryor and Norman
Steinberg. Richie left after the first draft and then Norman, Mel and I
wrote the next three or four drafts. It was a riot. It was a rioter’s
room!"
For casting, Brooks had originally planned to give the
lead role to Richard Pryor, but his history with drug arrests made the
studio claim he was uninsurable, so they refused to green light his
casting. Instead, the role of Sheriff Bart went to Cleavon Little.
Brooks offered the part of the Waco Kid to John Wayne, but Wayne turned
it down, stating that it went against his wholesome reputation, though
he promised Mel he'd be first in line to see the picture. Gig Young was
ultimately cast to play the Kid, but collapsed on the set the first day
of shooting from alcohol withdrawal syndrome, so the last minute
scramble to replace him lead to Gene Wilder, who had been offered the
role of Hedley Lamarr, but turned it down, along with Johnny Carson.
Carol Burnet Show cast regular, Harvey Korman eventually landed the
Lamarr role. Madeline Kahn objected when Brooks asked to see her legs
during her audition. "She said, 'So it's THAT kind of an audition?'"
Brooks recalled. "I explained that I was a happily married man and that I
needed someone who could straddle a chair with her legs like Marlene
Dietrich in Destry Rides Again. So she lifted her skirt and said, 'No
touching.'"
An interesting side note to the character of Hedly
Lamarr, with the name being an obvious parody of the name of actress
Heady Lamarr, the film production was sued by the actress for $100,000
for "infringing her right to privacy". Clearly she just didn't get the
joke, but the studio still went and settled with her out of court for an
undisclosed sum and an apology. This lawsuit would be referenced by an
in-film joke where Brooks' character, the Governor, tells Lamarr that
"This is 1874; you'll be able to sue HER."
During production,
Brooks ended up having numerous battles with the studio over content in
the film, with the studio constantly pushing back on things like the
repeated use of the "N" word and the aforementioned scene with Kahn.
Other scenes that stirred up battles included the flatulent campfire
beans dinner and the horse punching. But Brooks had final say in his
contract, so he stood firm on nearly all of his creative choices, with
the exception of cutting Bart's final line during Lili's seduction: "I
hate to disappoint you, ma'am, but you're sucking my arm." When
questioned about the use of the N-word, Brooks defended himself by
citing that he worked closely with both Richard Prior and Cleavon Little
on these lines and they were both insistent on the necessity to use
that language, though the film still received letters of complaint upon
its release. Brooks added in a 2012 interview: "If they did a remake of
Blazing Saddles today, they would leave out the N-word. And then,
you've got no movie."
Once completed, the film nearly fell into
oblivion as the studio considered dumping it and writing it off as a tax
loss, in an ironic shade of Brooks own prior work The Producers. At a
test screening for the studio executives, the audience was dour and
there were few laughs to be heard. The head of distribution suggested
binning it and dealing with the loss, but then Warner Bros president,
John Calley, insisted on releasing it in New York, Los Angeles and
Chicago as a test. The world premiere took place on February 7, 1974,
at the Pickwick Drive-In Theater in Burbank for 250 invited guests,
including Little and Wilder, who watched the film on horseback. Once it
was given wide release, it became the studio's top moneymaker that
summer.
I was just 11 years old when my parents took my brother
and I to see it in the theatre. I remember it vividly, because I'd
never laughed so hard or so much in a movie in my entire life. I'd
never seen anything like it, and the jokes just kept coming and coming,
in an unstoppable barrage. It was absolutely relentless and I
completely loved every minute of it. That feeling was shared by many
millions of others, though the critics, typically, were somewhat divided
in their appraisal. Some found it too scattershot in its attempts to
pack in too many gags too densely into the movie's run-time. But others
understood the approach and appreciated the balls it took to load a
movie up with that much comic ammunition. Roger Ebert gave the film
four stars out of four, calling it a "crazed grab bag of a movie that
does everything to keep us laughing except hit us over the head with a
rubber chicken. Mostly, it succeeds. It's an audience picture; it
doesn't have a lot of classy polish and its structure is a total mess.
But of course! What does that matter while Alex Karras is knocking a
horse cold with a right cross to the jaw?" Gene Siskel awarded three
stars out of four and called it "bound to rank with the funniest of the
year," adding, "Whenever the laughs begin to run dry, Brooks and his
quartet of gag writers splash about in a pool of obscenities that score
belly laughs if your ears aren't sensitive and if you're hip to western
movie conventions being parodied.
The film has gone on to be
recognized as a critical contribution to American cinema, being added to
the Library of Congress National Film Registry in 2006. Given the
consistency of racial turmoil that continues to plague North America, it
hasn't lost any of its cultural relevancy, though it's perhaps fallen
behind the times in terms of certain attitudes towards sexuality.
Still, it retains its edge, with many wondering if anything like it
could be made in the 21st century. It seems to be able to explore
racial boundaries in a way that other creative properties can't,
maintaining a kind of humour that is distinctive and unrepeatable.
2024-02-06
ZARDOZ @ 50
Celebrating
its 50th anniversary today is the science fiction feature film classic,
Zardoz, which was theatrically released on February 6th, 1974.
Written, produced, and directed by John Boorman and starring Sean
Connery and Charlotte Rampling, it's a dystopian vision of social
engineering and privilege stratification taken to an extreme, where an
immortal elite rule over tribes of savage brutes, denied a place at the
table of plenty.
With John Boorman hot off the massive success
of his last film, Deliverance, he was in a position to be somewhat
self-indulgent with his next major project. Initially, he'd planned to
attempt an adaptation of Tolkien's Lord of the Rings for United Artists,
but that project didn't get too far into development before the studio
sussed that the budget required to bring such an expansive work to the
screen would need to be astronomical. That was enough for them to pull
the plug, but Boorman was still of a mind that he wanted to create
something set in a fantastical imaginary world, so he started developing
his own story ideas.
Deciding he'd work within the science
fiction genre, he determined that he wasn't interested in the usual
"outer-space" tropes, but rather, he wanted to explore "inner-space" and
the concepts around the premise of a far future civilization advancing
too quickly for human intellectual and emotional sophistication to keep
pace. He was looking to explore the social dissonance such a dynamic
could create via the lens of extreme stratification. It was
metaphysically ambitious territory, but also a landscape that would
inevitably result in the film's creator overstepping his vision, pushing
his narrative into the realms of pretension.
After developing
the script, the project was first presented to Warner Bros, who
immediately turned it down, but Twentieth Century Fox had been courting
Boorman and were keen for a chance to work with him, so his agent used
that disposition as leverage to strong-arm their representative into a
"love it or leave it" deal, presenting him with the script and a couple
of hours to read it, with the provision that he'd have to offer a deal
on the spot or they'd walk. The exec emerged from reading the script
looking bemused and lost, but reluctantly agreed Fox would bankroll the
film.
Casting of the lead character of Zed had started out as a
role tailor-made to suit the man who'd made Deliverance so memorable,
with Burt Reynolds being offered the part, but he was unable to accept
due to illness at the time, so an alternate had to be found. Sean
Connery was coming off a run of highly successful James Bond films, but
his departure from the franchise had left him typecast and unable to
secure any major roles in its wake, so Boorman & Connery felt that
this was a perfect opportunity to redefine Connery's screen presence, so
he was signed on to the project.
Shooting of the film took place
entirely on location in the Republic of Ireland, which while offering
plenty of exceptional scenery, also offered a few cultural challenges.
The region's religious conservatism meant that shooting nudity was often
problematic, with female extras from the area reluctant to be seen
topless. There were also bans on importing of firearms because of the
IRA troubles, which threatened to shut down production as there were
numerous requirements for weapons to be used in various scenes. Yet
these issues were ultimately overcome and the film was shot between May
and August of 1973.
A group of County Wicklow artisans were hired
to create many of the film's futuristic costumes, which were designed
by Boorman's first wife, Christel Kruse. She decided that, because the
"Eternals'" lives were purely metaphysical and colourless, this should
be incorporated into their costumes. As The "Brutals" were lower, more
primitive beings, Christel decided that they would not care much about
what they were wearing, only what was functional and comfortable. As
stated in the magazine Dark Worlds Quarterly "functional" and
"comfortable" costumes ended up meaning that the costumes were extremely
revealing, "It is the costumes for the Brutal Exterminators, and Zed in
particular, that raise the eyebrows, with thigh-high leather boots,
crossed bandoleers and shorts that can only be described as 'skimpy',
the Brutals, and Connery in particular, exude raw masculinity,
particularly as they ride their steeds and fire their guns."
Upon
its release, the film immediately suffered a tide of highly negative
reviews, with critics nearly unanimous in their condemnation of its
overly ambitious story and awkward dialogue. Nora Sayre of The New York
Times wrote Zardoz "is science fiction that rarely succeeds in
fulfilling its ambitious promises... Despite its pseudo-scientific
gimmicks and a plethora of didactic dialogue, Zardoz is more confusing
than exciting, even with a frenetic, shoot-em-up climax". Yet Roger
Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times gave it two-and-a-half stars out of four
and called it a "genuinely quirky movie, a trip into a future that seems
ruled by perpetually stoned set decorators... The movie is an exercise
in self-indulgence (if often an interesting one) by Boorman, who more or
less had carte blanche to do a personal project after his immensely
successful Deliverance". On the other hand, Gene Siskel of the Chicago
Tribune gave it one star out of four and called it "a message movie all
right, and the message is that social commentary in the cinema is best
restrained inside of a carefully-crafted story, not trumpeted with
character labels, special effects, and a dose of despair that celebrates
the director's humanity while chastising the profligacy of the
audience".
Audiences were just as savage against it during its
theatrical run, with patrons from early shows actively warning those
waiting outside for the next showing to flee from the theatre. It
quickly dropped in box office receipts, leaving empty seats wherever it
played, until it was quickly pulled from the screens, barely earning
enough to cover its production costs. After the success of Deliverance,
this was a shocking downturn for Boorman. Yet his efforts would
eventually win him a cult following in later years.
As the home
video and later DVD markets exploded, Zardoz would become recognized as
one of the 1970s most bizarre and distinctive science fiction entries.
Before the demarcation created by the release of Star Wars, with its
attendant focus on superficial moralizing, action and spaceships, Zardoz
was a quintessential example of the decade's penchant for deeply
analytical extrapolations of humanity's future. It was a thought
experiment, asking the audience to question the nature of mortality and
our desire to circumvent its inevitability. It posed the question of
what an eternal youth culture would do with itself when its constraints
were effectively eliminated. Its answer was the depiction of a
hedonistic, decadent, emotionally short-circuited society, lacking any
sense of empathy or comprehension of the suffering happening outside its
entitled bubble. Actually, not a bad prediction of the culture of
today's mega-wealthy. It also presciently explored the concept of a
society managed by an artificial intelligence and how that entity could
distort and mutate a civilization's value systems.
Yet within its
ambitions, there is also the reality that it was, inescapably, a
failure on many levels, which make it a prime candidate for those
looking to scratch the "so bad it's good" itch. Its grasp
wholeheartedly exceeded its reach, with the results being often strained
and pompous as it attempted to out intellectualize itself, like some
awkward interpretive dancer. But that becomes part of its charm because
there's a certain amount of credit that must be given to Boorman for
having the courage to attempt the film in the first place. It's an
admiration that can be given to a creator willing to push their work
that far and risk such a spectacular face-plant after achieving so much
success with their previous work. Needless to say, Zardoz wasn't the
end of Boorman's career by any means, though it is certainly one of his
most notable flops.
My personal experience with the movie goes
back to seeing it on TV a couple of years after its theatrical release.
I must admit that the sight of burly-bear Sean Connery, who was looking
decidedly husker than in his Bond prime, bounding about the screen for
most of the movie in little more than a tiny red loincloth, was not at
all an unwelcome image for an adolescent gay boy like myself. My "spank
bank" owes a double debt to Boorman, not only for this movie, but also
for Ned Beaty in Deliverance. I am eternally grateful for both! But
even at my young age, I could appreciate the ludicrous aspects of this,
albeit also its higher aspirations. There are great, iconic moments
here, intertwined with just as many scenes of the ludicrous, like some
sort of overwrought performance art. For every face-palm you get
something brilliant and thought provoking. All in, what's not to love,
from the profound to the absurd? I've seen it many times since then and
it never fails to entertain, on a variety of levels. It's most
definitely a must-see for any fan of '70s science fiction, right up
along side the likes of Logan's Run, Phase IV, Demon Seed, The Andromeda
Strain and innumerable others that define the era's sense of
introspection.
2024-02-01
MC5 - KICK OUT THE JAMS @ 55
Celebrating
its 55th anniversary this month is the debut LP from the notorious MC5,
with Kick Out the Jams being released in February of 1969. With its
revolutionary stance and biting raw edge, it became a crucial foundation
stone for what would become "punk rock" within a few years.
The
roots of the band go back to their initial founding in 1963, which grew
out of a childhood friendship between guitarists Wayne Kramer and Fred
"Sonic" Smith. As well as being aficionados of the blues, Chuck Berry,
Dick Dale and The Ventures, the pair were also enraptured by the cutting
edge frenzy of free-jazz, with its wild flights of dissonance being
incorporated into the their soloing styles. The group's name is an
abbreviation of the term "Motor City Five", a reference to their
hometown stomping ground, Detroit, MI. They'd play there almost every
night, at any venue they could get a booking.
The group's high
energy style quickly earned them a lot of recognition as they began to
tour around the US, often upstaging the established acts they opened
for. Fans would demand encores before allowing the headliners to take
the stage. A trio of singles released throughout 1968 further bolstered
the band's popularity, while their hard-left politics raised eyebrows
and stoked paranoia about the radical nature of the band and its
followers. A fanatical, reverential cover story in Rolling Stone
cemented their position as emerging messiahs of Rock 'n' Roll.
Through
their activities, MC5 would become mentors to fellow Detroit bands like
The Stooges, while the band were, in-turn, being politically influenced
by the Marxism of the Black Panther Party and Fred Hampton, and poets
of the Beat Generation such as Allen Ginsberg and Ed Sanders, or
Modernist poets like Charles Olson. Black Panther Party founder Huey P.
Newton prompted the band's "manager", John Sinclair, to found the White
Panthers, a militant leftist organization of white people working to
assist the Black Panthers.
The band began to perform at various
protest rallies, especially in opposition to the Vietnam war, appearing
most notoriously at an event against the 1968 Democratic National
Convention in Chicago, which ended in a police riot. The event is also
notable for the duration of the MC5 performance, which went on for an
astonishing 8 hours! At the height of this publicity and mayhem, MC5
recorded their debut album, Kick Out the Jams, live, on October 30 &
31, 1968, at Detroit's Grande Ballroom. With the band performing at
their best in front of a rabidly receptive audience, the decision to
release a live album as their debut was an easy one. Culling the best
from the two nights, what ended up on vinyl was nothing short of sheer,
ferocious genius.
With the album bursting out of the speakers
with the declaration, "KICK OUT THE JAMS, MOTHERFUCKERS!", it was
inevitable that controversy would flare up in its wake. An alternate
rallying cry of "Kick out the jams, brothers and sisters" was used on
the single release of the title track, and also some versions of the
album after retailer, Hudson's, refused to sell the album with its
original expletive spiked incitement. This substitution was bitterly
objected to by the band and their management, who fought tooth and nail
to have it preserved. The title was a phrase that had originated while
the band were touring and working with a variety of bands who were noted
for their languid, extended improvisational performances, with MC5
blasting the stage free of the self-indulgent hippy jamming, in favour
of their high octane garage rock. The phrase was somewhat appropriated
20 years later by the Justified Ancients of Mu Mu, aka, The JAMs / KLF
for somewhat more esoteric purposes.
The album sold well upon
its release, quickly cracking over 100,000 units and peaking at #30 on
the Billboard charts, though there was some critical lack of consensus.
Yet the legacy of the album has helped it retain its status as a
constant reference point when musicologists attempt to trace the roots
of the punk and alternative rock movements that evolved in the ensuing
decades. Most of those roads invariably lead back to the MC5, alongside
a small cadre of other foundational bands like the Velvet Underground.
Essentially, anyone who takes proper, soul satisfying rock 'n' roll
music seriously has this record in their collection, likely right next
to the first New York Dolls and Stooges LPs.